The Hungarian Divide

Poverty in Hungary has become an increasingly large problem over the last several years, and there is a great rift in between rural life and urban life in Budapest, the capital of Hungary. Urbanization of Hungary has created an even larger divide between the rural areas and urban areas, as well as destroying the agricultural industry.

hungary graph Urbanization

This graph clearly shows the high percentage of Hungarian citizens living in cities rising over the last decade, having people migrate from rural areas to urban areas. This factor greatly contributes to the failing agriculture in Hungary, as the rural farmers are all migrating to cities because they are far too poor to maintain their land. As the urban population is rising, the rural population is in decline at a fairly high rate in the past decade.

hugary agriculture graph

As this graph shows, the population in rural areas has dropped almost 6% in the past decade, giving way to the gradual decline in agricultural production. This does not improve poverty rates in the country, as the poor farmers move to the city only to get stuck in the slums. The unemployment rate is a growing problem in Hungary as well, going hand in hand with the poverty rate, with many people requiring financial assistance. There are as many workplaces as there are workers in most rural areas outside of Budapest, with more people living off the benefits of assistance than people who actually hold jobs. The image below depicts how poor some of the rural farmers are; no electricity and no internet, keeping them walled of from the outside world. This man must use the water in his well in order to keep things cold, as he does not have a refrigerator.

poor man hungary

The rural citizens compared to the residents of Budapest have a completely different lifestyle and views, and Viktor Orban, the Prime Minister of Hungary, appeals to them much more than urban areas, truly showing the divide between the different lifestyles. Orban has a strong anti-immigrant policy that those in rural areas agree with, for many of them are older and lived through soviet union control and are terrified of culture change. The Urban populous tends to be younger and be pro-immigrant, however, Orban won his third election by a small margin in the past month. This urban-rural divide does not seem to have any immediate fixes and will take large efforts by the Hungarian government to bring change and unite the people, and fix the agricultural decline.

Poverty in Rural Poland

The rural-urban divide of Poland is most evident in the widespread rural poverty. While urban Poland is placed among highly developed countries, rural Poland still has not achieved this status. Rural Poland is widely known as a “second Poland.” Rural areas make up 93.2% of the country’s territory and 38.6% of its population. The low income or poverty and the social exclusion of rural Poland’s population is a big factor in the separation of rural and urban areas. Poverty in Poland is mostly recognized as rural poverty, as the extent of poverty in rural areas surpasses the respective values for urban regions. 

As of 2005:

Overall Urban Rural
Living in extreme poverty 12.3% 8.2% 18.7%
Below the relative poverty line 18.1% 12.5% 27.0%
Living in poverty 18.1% 12.3% 27.3%

The groups and categories that are most at risk of poverty are children, multi-child families, families living in rural areas, and families with low level of education and unemployment of the head of the family. In Poland, many of the rural population are at risk of poverty and social exclusion, such as ex-workers of the former state farms and their families, farmers and their families, large families, and children in poverty.

The situation of extensive regional differentiation of Poland and especially of rural areas is widely acknowledged by researchers and policy makers. The Eastern regions, known as the “Eastern Wall”, belong to the poorest parts of Poland. The Northern voivodeships, such as areas where former farm-states are located, are heavily impacted by unemployment. In the People’s Republic of Poland there were over 1,600 state farms with about 500,000 workers that lived with their families – a total of about two million people. When these state farms were closed and the economy transformed in 1991-1993, about 100,000 people were left unemployed. In 2005 up to 29.9% of the residents in rural areas that neither own state farms nor have a source of income with social pensions, socials benefits, and unemployment benefits, live below the subsistence minimum in extreme poverty. Localised in rural areas, affected by long term unemployment, and with poor education of the head of the families, families in former state-farm communities bear the characteristics of Polish poverty.

Screen Shot 2018-04-23 at 2.13.12 PM

In the early 90s, 20% of the employed population worked in agriculture. By 2005, this number had decreased to 17.4% and now continues to gradually decline. In comparison to other EU countries, Poland’s productivity of agriculture is very low. This is a result of great fragmentation of agriculture, excess of labor, the low education level of farmers, and insufficient modern equipment of agricultural holdings. The share of agriculture in Poland’s GDP was only 4.1% in 2005. In the early 2000s, incompetent politicians rather than capable professionals directed the Ministry of Agriculture and the Ministry of Labor and Social Policy. Politics have an extreme impact on social policy in Poland, especially on rural issues.

Today, Poland’s most severe social problem is child poverty, as it poses an important threat to the future of the country’s society. The young age of poor and/or unemployed people is one of the most relevant and characteristic traits of contemporary poverty in Poland. In 2005, children and adolescents up to the age of 19 made up over 40% of the population living in extreme poverty. Extreme poverty rate among children up to the age of 14 was about 19% that same year. It is especially difficult for children and young adults from poor families to access education. Educational barriers and low level of education completed by children from poor families easily leads to poverty, unemployment and social exclusion in adult life.

Screen Shot 2018-04-22 at 2.05.53 PM

Contemporary poverty in Poland is also directly connected with the number of children in a family, and in Poland, rural families tend to have more children than urban families. Families with four or more children are at high risk of poverty, as about 40.1% of people from such families were living in extreme poverty in 2004. Since the overall percentage of households living in poverty was 11.8%, extreme poverty in households with many children was more than three times greater than average. In 2005, extreme poverty of children from multi-child families increased to 44%.

Screen Shot 2018-04-23 at 12.48.57 PM

Child poverty is a long-term situation especially in rural areas of poverty, such as former state farm settlements, and quickly leads to long-term, chronic unemployment. Many programs have been put into action in Poland, addressing unemployed young people from both rural and urban areas. In 2002-2005 several governmental programs were implemented for occupational activation of the youth. The European Social Fund finances the active measure on the labor market, such as trainings and workshops. This financial assistance covered 340,000 people (95% of the unemployed). The EU rural development policy also considers the issue of rural unemployment, youth unemployment, and various forms of “hidden unemployment” in rural areas.

PiS Loves Rural Poles

A man stands on his farm, and next to him is the beautiful new tractor that was purchased for him by the government. Normally, this kind of thing would make someone ecstatic, but for this man (and many others like him in rural Poland), it only reminds him of the government’s actions within the EU.

After joining the European Union in 2004, Poland became a very successful and quickly growing economy. The political group in charge at the time, the Civic Platform, was very progressive. They believed that Poland should be a player in the larger world, and they generally were successful. The economy boomed, becoming the sixth largest, and to some this was a great benefit. To people in rural areas, it was not.

Different EU regulations on farming and agriculture had greatly affected the lives of farmers and people in rural areas. They felt as though a lot of the new improvements that the government had imposed upon them were unnecessary. Some had received money, but most also had to take out loans. The farmers had to sit back and wait while their fate was decided by a council in Brussels. They felt totally unrepresented by the government.


This map is incredibly telling of how Poland’s population is spread out. Normally, these have pockets of high density, surrounding low density, and then areas of very very low population. Poland’s population remains relatively constant, even very far outside those population centers in black. In all this area, a populist movement started to form. Feeling unrepresented, people began to align their beliefs more with the Law and Justice Party, the people that now are in power.

population density poland


As shown by this graph, the amount of people in the urban population in Poland has barely changed in the past ten years, and has even gone down. While this graph is a little amusing, it shows the greater problem in the area. People aren’t willing to change their lifestyles to fit the modern economy of Poland.


The Law and Justice Party (PiS) saw this, and they took action. They started campaigning in the more rural areas of Poland, and were even endorsed by the Roman Catholic Church.

Many people in rural Poland see voting as a religious action, and the fact that PiS had the Church’s vote essentially handed them the election.


The amount of power that Roman Catholicism has in this area can not be understated. As shown by the graph, 90% of the population in Poland is Roman Catholic. In outer-lying, more insular communities, the grip of religion is incredibly strong. The use of it as PiS’s base was the perfect move.

This tactic proved incredibly effective, as shown by the map below.


The areas in blue are those that had more than a 40% vote for PiS. As you can see, they won handily. Currently the party holds the majority of seats in the parliament.


They championed the ideals of upholding the wholesome and Christian values of Poland, while also hoping to improve conditions for farmers and rural people. So far they have raised minimum wage, provided a better safety net and welfare system, and have created some monetary benefits for low income families.

PiS is also playing a dangerous game with the EU, however. All eyes have been on Brexit for a while, but over in Poland, the same tension has been building. PiS is playing a dangerous game of tug of war with the EU, but it is yet to be seen what will happen.


In rural Poland though, people are happy.


The Czech Republic’s Urbanization Quandary

Prague, The Czech Republic’s largest populated city (1.3 million inhabitants), is known as the aging city. There is an increasing amount of people over the age of forty than that of younger adults and children. Fourteen percent of the vibrant and historic city’s population comes from abroad. “Businesses across Europe have come to Prague to house their headquarters and the city now accounts for 25% of the Czech Republic’s GDP. The city is now home to more service-oriented businesses such as hospitality, finance and commercial services with these sectors making up 80% of its business activity. 20% is still given over to industry based businesses.” Densely populated cities, and there are very few of them, like Prague, have been a name to fame for The Czech Republic’s 4.7% economic growth in 2017.

Image result for prague

The city of Prague populated with multi-story red-roofed houses. 

The Czech Republic has been facing a constant growth rate in urbanization (~73%) each year since 2006. About 35% of the Czech labor force is employed in manufacturing, the highest proportion of any EU country.

czech urb1

Sub-urbanization, commonly referred to as urban sprawl,  is generally viewed as a negative process; but this is likely caused by overflow from the largely populated cities such as Prague, Brno and Moravia Silesia. This process demands a commercial industrialization to the more rural areas, traffic lights, highways and shopping centers flood to these areas where there is a more steady growing population.

All of this sounds good, right? Sadly, there is more to this story which includes industrial areas and rural areas trying to hold on to their economy and culture as populists benefit.  There is a significant divide between socialists and capitalists, “The ideological principles behind the allocation of housing in actual socialism illustrate the systemic difference with capitalism: ‘1) housing should be a universal provision, not a market commodity; and 2) its production and distribution should not be a means of unearned income.’” This drastic change from socialism to capitalism has left many in the dust (around 70,000 homeless and unemployed Czechs).

Image result for population maps czech republic

In order to accommodate for this greater than  70% urban population, the Czech Government needs to invest in sub-urbanization. The built up and historical cities, like Prague and Brno, have a good standing system. But when the cities overflow and become completely overpopulated, citizens will need somewhere to go and not become another statistic for the homeless and unemployed population.

Hungary’s Agricultural Decline

Hungary, a country that rarely makes the news, is a relatively small country in the center of Europe.  It started as a part of the Ottoman empire, but now is closely tied to Russia. The country calls itself a democracy, but recently it has seemed to lean more towards being an authoritarian state. As many countries have experienced, Hungary is also become a much more urban country. The places where Hungarian citizens live have been shifting. For many years much of Hungary’s population lived in rural areas, farming to make a living, but as the country becomes more modern, more people are leaving the quiet farm life for big cities.


(Population Living in Rural Areas)

This shift has created a divide between the urban and rural populations. This change seems to stem from many things, as it does in many countries. One reason more people have moved into urban areas is just that Hungarians are able to find better jobs in cities, there are more jobs and there is a wider variety of jobs. One of the greatest reasons; however, is the loss of industrial and agricultural jobs.


Since Hungary’s agricultural production has been declining for a long time, starting in the 1990s, Hungary’s population has become concentrated to living in cities, and no longer being spread out evenly throughout the country. Crop production and animal production have both decreased in the recent past. Agriculture has always been a big part of Hungary’s economy, with a large amount of employment coming from jobs in the agricultural sector. So, this decrease of overall agriculture has hit the Hungarian population very hard.

Screen Shot 2018-04-20 at 12.48.36 PM

Before the many transitions Hungary went through, political and economical, in the 20th century, Hungary was able to compete with other countries in Western Europe with their food products, but as the amount of towns and cities that are decreasing in population, competition is no longer possible. In the past, the industry had few issues, and was a practical line of work. Although there has been some support financially for Hungary’s agricultural sector from the Hungarian government, the invariable pay has led rural areas to lose able-bodied workers to better jobs in cities. This will probably cause even further decline the the county’s agricultural production.


This sharp increase in urbanization has also left an interesting proportion of ages living in Hungary’s rural areas. Much of the rural population is made up of elderly people. Leaving the older populations to take care of Hungary’s farms.

With this older population being situated in the rural areas of Hungary, there is also a concentration of their political views. Many Hungarians have been known to support far right views, and a large concentration of these nationalists are living in rural areas. These nationalist views stem from the late 1900s when Hungary was having many different economic, social, and political issues. This almost “backward” thinking further separates citizens living in rural areas from other urban Hungarians. 

Throughout history, people have moved to cities to find prosperity. In Hungary, through an overall decrease in agriculture, Hungary’s rural population has declined and the amount of people living in urban areas has sharply increased. In some ways, this has made Hungary a more modern country.


Mexico & Drugs

The Mexican Drug Cartel, created in 2006, has been generating many problems for Mexico as a country.  This discussion focuses on the urbanization of drugs in Mexican States. The urbanization of drugs impacts Mexico in many ways, but tourism is at the top of the list.  The dangers that arise in Mexico due to drugs greatly affects the tourism, and more-so, the revenue generated from tourism. Due to the dangers that exist in Mexico, the U.S. State Department has instituted a system that is devised of four levels of danger in foreign states to warn American travelers of the dangers in foreign countries.  Level 1 means that there is not much to warn travelers about; there isn’t much conflict in a foreign country or state. Level 2    means that there is increased warning directed to travelers when traveling to a foreign country or state. Level 3 means that travelers should reconsider their decision to vacation in a foreign country or state. Finally, Level 4 highly advises travelers to steer clear of the foreign country or state, as it is very dangerous.

Screen Shot 2018-04-22 at 10.33.23 PM (1)


There are 31 Mexican states; as a whole, the country is rated at a Level 2.  Level 2 means that American tourists should have increased caution when traveling to Mexico (  This discussion focuses on Playa Del Carmen, Mexico City, Jalisco, and Colima.  All of these Mexican states range from Level 2 to Level 4 travel warnings.


Playa del Carmen is a very popular Mexican tourist sight, especially for college students around Spring Break.  In February of 2018, a ferry exploded in Playa Del Carmen. The explosion ultimately prohibited U.S. Government employees or officials from travelling on ferries in Mexico; private transportation is required.  The explosion injured 25 people, but did not kill anyone. While some fingers point to Mexican drug gangs as being responsible for the incident, terrorism has been ruled out. To date, no one has been convicted of the crime.  Due to this incident, the U.S. State Department has categorized Playa Del Carmen as a Level 2 for danger. (

Screen Shot 2018-04-22 at 10.36.39 PM

Mexico City is another popular destination in Mexico. (  An article states that in Mexico City, alone, there are over 20,000 places to buy drugs from undercover or well-hidden drug gangs (  Drugs are being sold everywhere in Mexico City, such as small grocery stores, football fields, and apartment buildings.  Overall, the sales of drugs have increased from 200 places to 3,000 in the past five years. This overgrowth has increased in homicides.  The state is rated as a Level 2 by the U.S. State Department.


Jalisco, Mexico is rated by the U.S. State Department at Level 3.  While U.S. citizens are highly advised to not go to Jalisco, U.S. government employees are under strict instruction if they are to stay in the Mexican state for work. (  Jalisco is also home to the Jalisco Cartel, a Mexican Drug Cartel group that is infamous for horrible kidnappings and killings (  Most recently, the gang was involved in a mass shooting of 15 Jalisco police officers back in 2015.  Months later, the gang acted again and shot down a military helicopter. The gang has access to many military grade weapons.  Overall, Jalisco is considered a dangerous city, and not recommended for tourism.

Screen Shot 2018-04-22 at 10.38.47 PM

Colima, Mexico is known as the fourth smallest Mexican state.  Recently, it has gotten the reputation for being controlled by drug cartels and crime.  Drug cartels are fighting for the territory to easily important synthetic drugs in and out of Mexico (  Colima, Mexico has been rated by the U.S. State Department as a Level 4. The state cautions that no one travels there (  U.S. State Department officials must abide under strict rules if they are to travel to the state.  Some of these rules include not attending adult entertainment clubs or participating in any kind of gambling.  At Level 4, Colima is considered an extremely dangerous territory for tourism and travel.


Mexico is often considered a popular vacationing country.  Over the years, it has become increasingly dangerous, impacting its ability to generate income via tourism.  The U.S. State Departments levels its individual states from Levels 1 to 4; 1 being safe, 4 being extremely dangerous.  Playa Del Carmen, Mexico City, Jalisco, and Colima range from Levels 2 to 4 in safety. Although none are classified at Level 1, Playa Del Carmen and Mexico City are considered the safest, ranked at Level 2.  While Jalisco and Colima are ranked at 3 and 4, respectively, travel there is scarce. Mexico’s drug urbanization is greatly impacting tourism and ultimately Mexico’s ability to produce an ample income.

Screen Shot 2018-04-22 at 10.39.54 PM

Photo 1:

Photo 2:

Photo 3:

Photo 4:

Urbanization In Egypt


Egypt’s capital–Cairo–has been facing the problem of overpopulation since 1960s, the most recent data from the Central Agency for Public Mobilisation and Statistics in Egypt stated that within the Cairo governate, the overall urban population density is 117,000 per square mile—1.5 times more than the population density of Manhattan and the ville de Paris.


Within Cairo, there are four different governates, and one that had the most significant gain is the one located in urban Cairo—Giza. It is located at the west bank of Nile river, and is considered the core of the urban area in Egypt. As a comparison, Kalyoubia is located to the north of Cairo and the majority of its population live in rural areas. Overall, from 1937-2012, the growth of the urban area is significantly bigger than that of rural areas.  Many people choose to move to Cairo because it symbolizes concentration of control, resources and countless opportunities in the minds of most people in Cairo, which established a centralized social order by which the whole population aspires the citizenship in Cairo. Therefore, this ambition to acquire citizenship of the metropolitan city generated a huge immigration from rural regions to urban areas.


As a result of Egypt’s rapid urbanization process, an increasing number of buildings and factories were built. Since the 1970s, the brick buildings were built on the farmland with Nile silt that provide rich topsoil for the foundation of agriculture in Egypt. There is a distinctive line between these 12-story, unpainted, brick buildings and the farmland near the capital. Due to the limited amount of lands available, the buildings and farmland are in direct competition.  The Greater Cairo hosts about twenty percent of the country’s total population, over 18 million people. In doing so, a growing trend of informal and unsafe ares is generated by this huge presence of urban population. About 1,171 areas in Egypt are considered informal, and 60 percent of these areas are located in Cairo.


The Egyptian government banned building on agricultural land in order to push the expansion of big cities into desert, and gain the massive new investment. Regardless of the ban on construction on agricultural land, most new construction in Egypt are located on farmland, which is a big problem for the country since only 2.75 percent of its land is suitable for farming. Each year, 16,000 acres of agricultural land are diminishing as a result of new construction projects. A growing trend of informal and unsafe ares is also generated by the huge presence of urban population. About 1,171 areas in Egypt are considered informal, and 60 percent of these areas are located in Cairo.  A contractor could pay a bribe of £230 for an illegal apartment to get power, and £900 for a building to be connected to the grid. The reason that more people are willing to live in these illegal apartments than government supported buildings is that there’s no “soft infrastructure”. Although the government has build roads, pipes, and power lines, there are not enough schools, hospitals, and cultural activities.


Due to the unprecedented rapid urban growth over the past four decades, the infrastructure and service delivery system have troubles keeping up with cities’ population burden. Impoverished people have to settle in unplanned or unsafe areas because there is no public land or workable housing policies. After a while, problems like infrastructure deterioration, insufficient public transportation, high air and noise pollution, and traffic congestion surfaced as the result of improper planning. Urbanization in Egypt affects not only the capital, but also regional capitals, such as the Alexandria, by increasing their population exponentially caused by both the rural population shift and the demographic explosion. Currently, the biggest threat to the natural resources in Egypt is urban expansion and population growth. Water pollution and poor sewage treatment is partly responsible for the high infant mortality throughout Egypt.