Overfishing in France

Overfishing is a severe issue to deal with in France. Overfishing is the depletion of fish in a body of water/area of water due to fishing. The number of overfished waters has gone up 200% in the past half-century with ⅓ of studied fish being caught more than they can reproduce. On December 9, 2014, the United Nations passed resolutions that possessed significant steps in reducing overfishing. However, the delegate of the European Union was upset because not enough was said to protect marine mammals.

The resolution does do more to support data collection research. France has been in favor of the 1995 Agreement for the Implementation of the Provisions of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea of 10 December 1982 relating to the Conservation and Management of Straddling Fish Stocks and Highly Migratory Fish Stocks, and Related Instruments (document A/69/L.30.) One of the biggest problems with the fishing industry is that most information is on paper thus complicated to share. Also, the information that can be shared is not being shared. The United Nations Commission for Europe’s aim is to “promote standards for exchange of information related to fishery activities, share experiences on development and implementation issues, and facilitate and support the implementation of these standards worldwide.” This information standard is a significant step toward healthier waters. France is also in the European Union and is expected the end overfishing by 2020. Fishing pressure in the North East Atlantic has halved in the past 20 years, but they are still over the union standard. France has to fight the lack of information they have. Currently, less than 10% of all fisheries in Europe have an estimate for their biomass and due to different benchmarks created 24-56% of all EU fish stocks do not meet union standards. While France has gone along with the overfishing promises, it is getting nervous. France teamed up with Italy and Spain back in December of 2018 to push back the EU deadline. They want to end overfishing by 2025 instead of 2020. In addition to this France wants to reduce the number of days at sea by 10%, not 90%.

While the Mediterranean is one of the most overfished regions on the Earth, France needs more time to ease the fishing industries into the new regulations. To fix overfishing, France is willing to end overfishing in its waters by 2025 at the earliest and 2030 at the latest. France would like more information to be collected on biomass of streams in highly fished areas and for the international community to end overfishing by 2030. France is willing to give more time, till 2035, to China, Peru, Chile, Japan, Russia, Indonesia, the United States, Thailand, and India due to their large number of fish that are caught every year. France would like to fund applicable NGOs such as American Cetacean Society, Endangered Seas Campaign, Greenpeace – Oceans Campaign, International Marine Mammal Association, and Marine Conservation Biology Institute.

There Aren’t Plenty of Fish in the Sea

One of the biggest threats to fisheries on a global scale is overfishing. Caused due to fish being caught at a rate faster than they can reproduce, overfishing is currently impacting more than 85% of the world’s fish resources . Overfishing typically results from a lack of oversight which causes administrators to have difficulty regulating and enforcing proper fishing activity. Another driving force behind overfishing is government funded subsidies which produce an excess in fishermen, currently estimated to be 2.5 times more than the amount needed .These factors along with the lack of adequately protected waters—with only 1.5% of the oceans designated as protected areas—cause many more fish to be caught than is optimal for the environment. Often, many of the excess fish are juveniles who have not yet reproduced, creating a fish scarcity which can be devastating for both the environment and local economies. The effects of overfishing can be disastrous for ecosystems, resulting in an imbalance of predators to prey causing a population surge in smaller fish which can in turn overwhelm coral reefs. This disruption to the ecosystem can further reduce the population of fish in an area, putting the livelihoods of local fishermen in jeopardy.

Many Greek fishermen are currently experiencing this financial insecurity as stocks in the Mediterranean, the world’s most overfished sea, continue to dwindle. According to Paraskeva Vasilakopoulos from the Hellenic Centre for Marine Research in Athens, “the vast majority of stocks” in the Mediterranean “are below safe biological limits” as a result of “overexploitation” combined with “catch[ing] too many fish before they get the chance to reproduce”. In an effort to combat overfishing, Greece has been working to reduce the number of fishermen by offering money in exchange for the fishermen giving up their fishing license and boat. Greece hopes that through this reduction in fishermen more fish will be able to spawn, reducing the scarcity of fish in the Mediterranean. Greece is also working to increase fishing surveillance with the goal of better enforcing fishing regulations in line with those in the European Union’s 2014 Common Fisheries Policy which set a maximum limit for fishing and restricted fishermen’s ability to dump extra fish into the water. In doing so, Greece believes it will cut down on the practice of bottom trawling, in which large boats drag a net along the seafloor to collect all of the fish in a particular region, which is very popular in the Mediterranean and plays a large role in the overfishing crisis. This practice not only destroys the ocean floor, but also leads to the collection of many juvenile fish that are then discarded, often meaning that these fish did not reproduce in their lifetimes. Bottom trawling alone produces 50% of all discarded fish in the Mediterranean, and, as it is frequently carried out by larger corporations, has played a large role in the instability of smaller fishermen’s businesses. Many Greek fishermen have watched their catches decrease by half as overfishing has worsened in recent years, forcing many out of the business as fishing is no longer profitable enough for them to support their families. Greece recognizes this difficulty and has also been exploring the practice of open-ocean fish farming in order to artificially spur on the fish supply until regulations can be effectively established and enforced to steady the fish population naturally. Additionally, in 2017, Greece signed the MedFish4Ever Declaration , a 10-year plan designed to manage fisheries, which Greece feels is a demonstration of its commitment to working towards the elimination of overfishing in the Mediterranean.

Indonesian Plastic Pollution

Indonesia is currently second, only to China, in the world in contribution of plastic pollution. Out of the roughly 2.41 million tons of plastic pollution in the entire ocean, 200,000 tons come from Indonesian rivers and streams. Four of Indonesia’s main rivers rank on the top 20 most polluted rivers in the world. Public water in Indonesia has become contaminated with E. Coli, fecal matter, and other dangerous pathogens. This has caused most of the water supply to be undrinkable. Because many citizens do not have access to clean water pipes, about 80% of the population is forced to consume, bath in, and use the polluted river water, daily. So far, the government has put in little effort to fund and supply clean water pipes, so people are still forced to consume contaminated water or use bottled water, which, in turn, contributes to the pollution problem. Because many Indonesian islands sit in the Indonesian Throughflow, it is common to find foreign plastics floating through these areas. Plastic waste and pollution from Malaysia, the Philippines, and elsewhere in the Pacific Ocean is often brought into Indonesian waters. To combat this extreme amount of pollution, Bali officials ordered 700 cleaners and 35 trucks to collect some of the garbage on Bali beaches. While they collected many hundreds of tons of garbage, the problem still persists and is found on many more islands, not just Bali. A step that could be taken to further clean Indonesia, could be to deploy these people and trucks on multiple islands and have the government fund a longer term clean-up project. Indonesian officials say they plan to reduce plastic waste 70% by 2025, but this goal, while being extreme, could only be attainable with more government action and funding. In 2016, a trial policy to charge a fee for plastic bags in shops was set in place. This policy, while only being a trial at the time, was a step in the right direction toward reaching the goals of reducing plastic pollution by 70%. Making this policy nationwide would contribute to the solution of plastic pollution in Indonesia. Because the majority of the plastic pollution in the oceans originates on land, reducing the amount of plastic used on land in the first place will reduce the amount of pollution found in the ocean. Other policies and trials to reduce plastic waste and recycle materials have been put in place recently. One plan, to turn waste into plastic roads has proven to be an effective and successful use of recycled plastics and would be a good project to continue. The roads will use a large amount of the plastic and are an easy way to collect and eliminate the waste in the ocean. Again, more government funding would assist in promoting and progressing this project. Finally, outside help would be required to eliminate a significant amount of plastic pollution in the ocean. Due to the Indonesian Throughflow, a sum of the plastic waste in Indonesian waters originates from other countries. Efforts within those countries to reduce plastic waste or prevent the flow into Indonesian, as well as into other countries, water would be necessary in reducing the waste by 70% and would help in the overall reduction of plastic waste, worldwide.

Greek Refugee Crisis: Damaging the Economy and Ecosystems Alike

Because of the warm climate, beautiful beaches, high safety, and unique cuisine, Greece has become a major tourist destination in recent years. Due to the heavy influx of travelers, Greece’s struggling economy has become dependent on the revenue gained from the tourism industry. In 2017 alone, 27.2 million tourists visited Greece and brought in $35 billion euros, making up 61% of the total revenue. With a population of only 11 million citizens, the amount of people increases by more than double and creates a crowded, busy environment. Many of these tourists visit the beautiful islands of Lesbos, Chios, and Samos. These islands, however, are facing a major refugee crisis due to the nearly 60,000 refugees that are inhabiting or passing through these islands.

The majority of refugees entering Greece are fleeing Syria, Iraq, and Afghanistan. Greece currently holds over 50,000 refugees, more than half of whom are women and children. Over 11,000 refugees are on the islands of Lesbos, Chios, and Samos. The Moria refugee camp, situated on the island of Lesbos, is currently home to more than 8,300 refugees while is it only equipped for 3,100 people. Refugee camps and shelters are facing extreme problems of overcrowding and lack of materials.

Many people fear that this major influx of refugees will negatively impact the tourist industry.  In 2016 alone, 173,000 refugees arrived by sea, many just passing through to surrounding countries. Not only does this extreme increase in people add to the busy environment, it has proven, for some, to lessen business from the tourism industry. The Blissarys, a couple living on the island of Lesbos, owned a cafe but were forced to close it due to a lack of business. They found that this lack of business coincided with the incoming refugees. Studies have shown that domestic tourism has decreased by 66.7% during the crisis period.

Aside from the economic fear of many business owners and locals, citizens are becoming increasingly concerned about the ecological and environmental toll that this crisis is taking on Greek ecosystems. In the refugee camps, food is regularly served in plastic containers with utensils and water bottles. Served three times a day to about 9,000 refugees, this produces over 27,000 pieces of plastic waste every day in one single camp. Due to the absence of a recycling center on the islands, none of this material is recycled and, instead, dumped into a landfill. Rubber dinghies and plastic life vests are stranded and washing up on shores as well, contributing to the environmental problems. People have developed “upcycling” projects as a solution to this immense waste and a way to repurpose many of the deserted materials. Lovest, a Greek upcycling organization started in 2016, has collected many of the life vests and boats and recycled them into products such as backpacks, book covers, and jewelry. This project has developed into a large organization over the years and has provided many job opportunities to locals and refugees, alike.

It would be beneficial for the State Department to invest in the Greek refugee crisis to preserve the tourism-dependant economy and delicate environment. Support for environmental non governmental organizations, such as Lovest, would assist in organizing beach clean ups, producing less waste, and increase the use of and proper disposal of recyclable materials. Organizations, such as the International Rescue Committee, aid refugees by providing necessary materials, support, job training, and assistance in rebuilding lives. Support for this organization would assist in solving the refugee crisis and alleviate the strain on Greece’s economy and environment.  

Censorship in Turkey

Recep Tayyip Erdoğan became president of Turkey in 2014, and since then, the prosecution rate for “insulting the president” has risen by 4470% and the conviction rate by 5148%. In order to convict over 200 journalists, media workers, and ordinary citizens, the government uses Article 299 of Turkey’s penal code. Article 299 states that “Any person who insults the President of the Republic shall be sentenced to a penalty of imprisonment for a term of one to four years; (Amended on 29/6/2005 – By Article 35 of the Law no. 5377) Where the offence is committed in public, the sentence to be imposed shall be increased by one sixth.”  While in Turkey, working with NGOs like Freedom House and Human Rights Watch, I aim to (carefully and lawfully) challenge the censorship of the internet and media by the government. 

In 2007, Erdoğan’s political party, the Justice and Development Party (AKP), won its second election. During this period, the police found out about an alleged coup plot created by a secret organization called “Ergenekon”. Doğan Media Group’s newspapers reported on a corruption scandal in 2009 and was subsequently fined $2.5 million by the government; this forced the group to sell two newspapers to a government-aligned company. The discovery of Ergenekon led to many high-profile cases, and even to another coup plot in 2010 with the code-name “Sledgehammer”. Numerous journalists, judges, and teachers were convicted, along with hundreds of military officers. During the summer of 2013, a nationwide anti-government protest occured, and the police brutally put an end to the demonstration. At the height of this “crackdown,” mainstream media showed nothing and CNN Türk broadcast a documentary about penguins. In 2014, newspapers linked to Fethullah Gülen, an imam who fell from Erdoğan’s good grace’s, became the targets for police raids. These media companies were taken over by those trusted by and allied with the government. Following a coup plot in 2016, six journalists were sentenced to life in prison. In the past five years, Erdoğan has sued around 2,000 people for “insulting” him. As of this past spring, with the purchase of Doğan Media Group by a corporation loyal to Erdoğan, the Turkish government controls over 85% of national mainstream media. On January 8, 2019, journalist Pelin Ünker was convicted of “insulting a public official” and “libel” over two articles she had written discussing the “Paradise Papers”, which were 13.4 million “confidential electronic documents relating to offshore investments by around 120 high-profile names from around the world.” The government now blocks over 220,000 websites and 150,000 URLs. It’s clear that the government has an enormous amount of control over the mainstream media and internet. 

Many journalists, however, consider the lack of solidarity between reporters and media workers another major cause of the fall in press freedom. Since Erdoğan became president in 2014, following 12 years as a major political player in the Turkish government, not only has he given himself executive powers by recently abolishing the country’s Parliament, but by also demanding Parliament pass a law in March forcing streaming and digital TV services “to register with Turkey’s media watchdog, known as RTUK, and abide by the same rules as television broadcasters. RTUK can impose penalties, revoke licences, force providers to censor or withdraw content, and ask the courts to block access to those who do not comply.” Additionally, Erdoğan has introduced more advanced and effective technology to block content. Deep Packet Inspection (DPI), for example, is a technology through which all of the data sent to internet service providers is examined. DPI gives authorities the power to block only specific content as opposed to an entire website. This allows for the government ro read and analyze all unencrypted data processed through the DPI technology, and intervene if they feel necessary. Erdoğan also has the Turkey Information and Communication Technologies Authority (BTK) utilize an “innovative but dangerous” certification method. The BTK has created “an insecure certificate” that shows an error code when a user attempts to visit a blocked site. Due to the advanced nature of such a code, the average citizen won’t realize that the website has been blocked. The free VPN and proxy services that allow citizens to access blocked sites can also be dangerous; most of them can access internet traffic, and might interfere with it, collecting information on everything the user does. 

All in all, Erdoğan has greatly decreased the press freedom of Turkish citizens and media workers since his rise to power in 2014, following a period of slight freedom in the 2000s. 

Islam in France

Over the years, France has amassed the largest Muslim population in the Western World. With nearly an eighth of its population hailing from Muslim origin, France has large numbers of citizens of Algerian, Tunisian and Moroccan descent, migrating from their home countries to France in search of employment or a new home. Although the state of France is secular in nature, a large majority of the Muslims continue to practice their religion in the French framework of laïcité, as personal religious beliefs must not infringe upon society as a whole. In November 2015, in the aftermath of the coordinated terrorist attacks in Paris, French authorities shut down three mosques for the first time, with extremist activities and radicalization being given as the reason. These rather deadly attacks changed the character of Islamist radicalization from a security threat, to a wide-scale societal problem. Former president François Hollande, and former Prime Minister Manuel Valls saw the central values of the state of France being challenged, and labeled these violent occurrences as attacks against fundamental secular and democratic values. With increasing public anxiety and ever-present tensions between the nation and its Muslim minority, France struggles to integrate this community while staying true to its roots.

Over the past year, current French President Emmanuel Macron has spoken out on his plans to “set down markers on the entire way in which Islam is organized in France” in an effort to create an “Islam of France”. Successive governments, beginning in the 1980s, have attempted to generate a brand of Islam unique to France, with the double objective of integrating and assimilating the country’s Muslim minority and fighting Islamist extremism. The goal of this particular branch of Islam is to conform to pre-existing national values, markedly secularism, while remaining insusceptible to the radical Quran interpretations which have gained a following in select parts of the Muslim world. Although the objective to restructure Islam in France isn’t a new concept, Macron’s initiative is distinct in its viewpoints and outlook. Macron hopes to break ties with foreign funding in order to disconnect Muslim organizations in France from other Muslim majority countries. Macron also hopes to train imams in France, rather than sending them to the Middle East to train. This approach would center around cultural values, rather than religious texts, to keep with the secularism of the nation, and create a generation of imams “made in France”.

Although the spike in anti-Muslim sentiment following the attacks of 2015 and 2016 has receded significantly, many Muslims residing in France say this prejudice remains prevalent both socially and legally. From a 2004 law banning religious symbols in public schools, a 2010 law banning the full-face veil in public, the attempt to ban burqinis on beaches in 2016, and as of last January, the banning of religious clothing in National Assembly, 43% of the public considers Islam “incompatible with the values of the Republic”. For many Muslims, the concept of a French Islam created by the state appears to be a continuation of policies they view as tools of assimilation, instituted to stifle individual religious expression. According to Hakim El-Karoui, a fellow at the Institut Montaigne think tank, as well as one of the experts Macron hopes to consult in his efforts, the state of France should enable the emergence of a French Islam, rather than generate one itself. While he applauds Macron’s intentions to distance French Islam from the Islam of the Arab world, El-Karoui believes the plan should reach even farther, proposing a shift in responsibility from the government to the prominent French Muslims, who are only interested in the country they currently reside in, France.

President Emmanuel Macron has set forth the foundation to move forward with his unique ideas, but if the goal is to protect France from violent mindsets preached in the name of Islam, this approach, neglecting the demands of France’s diverse Muslim communities, may fall short. To form an Islam compatible with the values of France, the Muslim community needs to step up and take the lead in this mission.

Solving the Issue of High Youth Unemployment in Bosnia and Herzegovina

Bosnia and Herzegovina’s youth unemployment rate is one of the highest in the world. Nearly two-thirds of Bosnians aged 15 to 24 are unemployed. The high rate significantly constrains aggregate demand and economic growth in the country. There are four factors responsible for the crisis: corruption, a lack of entrepreneurship, ethnic divisions, and lingering economic scars from the Bosnian War in 1992 – 1995. To help alleviate the issue of youth unemployment in Bosnia and Herzegovina, the State Department should lend financial support to Oxfam and the International Monetary Fund.

In 1992, the fall of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia triggered a series of political conflicts that led to the Bosnian War. The war raged for three years, claiming more than 100,000 lives, displacing more than 2 million people, and laying waste to the economy of the region. The peace agreement that ended the war, the Dayton Peace Accords, prevented the region’s economy from rebounding and are responsible for the high rate of unemployment in Bosnia and Herzegovina. The accords preserved the region’s ethnic divisions and created a needlessly complicated system of government. Modern-day Bosnia and Herzegovina consists of two main political entities, the Republika Srpska and the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Each entity consists of very different ethnic groups, the majority of which live apart from one another.  Bosnia and Herzegovina has three presidents, 13 prime ministers, a Parliament consisting of two houses, and many small lawmaking assemblies. The complex system of government facilitates corruption, and much of the foreign aid given to the country is misused. Enterprises in the ethnically uniform regions of the country are unwilling to hire people from outside their region.  The large size of the public sector, which has been estimated to account for nearly 70% of the country’s GDP, has led to regulations and taxes that make starting a business difficult.  

Oxfam is an international NGO composed of 19 charitable organizations. Its primary mission is the elimination of poverty around the world. Unlike many other NGOs with the same mission, Oxfam does not distribute material goods. The organization seeks to address the conditions that lead to poverty in the first place. Oxfam is currently working on many projects in Bosnia and Herzegovina. The NGO’s objectives in the region are to teach Bosnians the basics of business and entrepreneurship and to help them network with people outside of their local communities. The jobs created by the newly formed enterprises will increase the prominence of the country’s private sector and help decrease the country’s high rate of youth unemployment. By working with Bosnians directly, Oxfam bypasses the issue of government corruption. By assisting Bosnians with networking outside of their local communities, Oxfam will reduce the separation among different ethnicities living in Bosnia and Herzegovina.

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) is an IGO consisting of 189 member countries. The IMF’s main objective is to promote international financial stability and monetary cooperation. The organization monitors regional, national, and global financial developments, and makes recommendations to its member countries. Bosnia and Herzegovina has an arrangement with the IMF’s Extended Fund Facility (EFF). The EFF provides financial support to federal programs in countries with balance-of-payments deficits with the goal of correcting structural issues that bring about those deficits. A balance-of-payments deficit occurs when a country imports more goods than it exports and can make an economy dependent on foreign aid and remittances. The IMF monitors how countries use the EFF’s aid and can withdraw the aid from a country that mishandles it. The EFF lends support to programs in Bosnia and Herzegovina that seek to increase the number of goods the country produces and exports. These programs will create many stable manufacturing jobs and decrease youth unemployment in the country.

By supporting Oxfam and the International Monetary Fund  (IMF) financially, the State Department will help reduce the youth unemployment rate in Bosnia and Herzegovina. The organizations can address many of the issues responsible for the high rate of unemployment.  Both organizations will create new businesses and jobs in the country. Oxfam will reduce ethnic division by helping Bosnians network outside of their local communities. The IMF can cut-off its support if the country misuses it, and aid given to Oxfam will go directly to Bosnians.

The Time For Turkey to Consider Long Term Integration Efforts has Arrived

Having welcomed over 3.5 million Syrian Refugees into their country due to civil conflict in Syria (more than any other country), the time for Turkey to develop long term integration efforts has seemingly arrived. Only a handful of these 3.5 million fleeing the conflict in Syria though are registered as asylum seekers, leaving the majority of them vulnerable to unlawful deportation, coerced returns to Syria and the denial of basic services such as health care and education. The Turkish government is attempting to provide aid where it is able and sees fit, spending an estimated 450 million euros a month, covering basic needs, such as education facilities, health centers and medical services. Turkey has spent an overall estimate of about $30 billion since 2011, with minimal international burden sharing.

Demographically, the vast majority of these refugees are mixed in with the Turkish population, concentrated in twelve of Turkey’s eighty one provinces. Only 213,000 are estimated to be living in refugee camps provided by Turkey. The number of Syrians in Kilis (a province in south central Turkey that borders Syria) alone, make up about 95% of its local population. This vast number of refugees throughout all of Turkey though, is only expected to grow in the coming years. Turkish Authorities have estimated by 2028 there will over 5 million Syrians taking refuge in Turkey, a clear call for more durable forms of protection and full integration.

Integration efforts of sorts have already begun in Turkey, though have all come to face challenges of their own, such as monetary needs or Turkish Law. Mr.Erdogan The Turkish President for instance, has granted citizenship to more than 60,000 Syrians (mostly those with higher cultural and economic capital). The issue with this number, is that the remaining millions of Syrians taking refuge in Turkey are left in “limbo”, left to face rather distasteful and difficult conditions. To further protect those in “limbo”, Turkey’s 2014 Law on Foreigners and International Protection, states that foreigners and others will not be sent back to places where they will be tortured, or suffer inhumane treatment, or be threatened due to race, religion or group membership. The issue with this seemingly ideal law though, is that it prevents large influxes of refugees to resettle permanently in Turkey. The Turkish government has also been working to expand education for the 800,000 Syrian refugee children since 2016, attempting to integrate them into the public school system. By the end of 2018, the Turkish government plans to close all temporary education centers and plans to build in their place 150 new schools with donated funds. Building these new schools and permanently integrating these Syrian refugees cannot be done though without additional sources of money.

GOAL, an NGO that works towards ensuring that the poorest and most vulnerable in the world, especially those affected by humanitarian crises, have access to the necessities of life such as shelter, food, water and sanitation, healthcare, education, and economic opportunities, would be perfectly suited to offer aid towards further integration of the Syrian refugees into Turkish society. GOAL has been working in Turkey since 2014, and has reached over 43,000 Syrian refugees with health care services, and has reached many more through additional services such as vocational training support and legal support within Turkey. With the correct funding, GOAL would be able to strengthen the variety of areas that it already helps, providing a brighter future for the refugees already living within Turkey’s borders.

Providing crucial assistance to countries all across the world that are in crisis, as well as helping refugees through months and likely years of displacement, the IGO, the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), has played a vital role in Turkey. The UNHCR has helped manage the entry of refugees through two border points by giving security checks as well as health checks and registration. In addition, the staff visited the border areas and camps daily in order to supply necessary aid. The UNHCR supported Turkey’s 2014 Law on Foreigners and International Protection as well, revealing them to be in support of further integration of Syrian refugees into Turkish society. With additional funding provided by the State Department, GOAL and the UNHCR would have access to new forms of aid and influence that would allow them to permanently integrate Syrian refugees into Turkey.


Save the Roma

The Roma, known as Gypsies, is a group of ethnic migrants in Europe.The Roma have no permanent residency. Instead, they move around places and live in scattered camps all over Europe. They have a long history of suffering from the lack of human rights protection. Tracing their origin in northwestern India 1500 years ago, these groups of people currently live in central and eastern Europe.
Because of the rise of the nationalism in Eastern Europe, the Roma have become the target blamed for refugee issue. Ever since the end of the Soviet era, the Roma have been threatened: especially under the populist surge in Europe. Europeans hold strong misperceptions and false generalizations of Roma culture.
In Italy, there has been a large amount of human rights abuses since 2008, including the destruction of Roma community buildings. Matteo Salvini, Italy’s prime minister, stigmatized the Roma as outsiders to the country even though they are Italian citizens. According to Salvini’s policy, Roma children are required to record their fingerprints. This is an ethnic discrimination against the Romani race.
Aside from political persecution, the Roma plays a marginalized role in European societies. People have stereotypical impressions of them as poor, sick, and foreign.“ Often, the Roma are perceived as incapable of integration. Gradually, they have become the scapegoat for mainstream European culture. The United Nations has defined this situation as discrimination
The European Roma Rights Center is a Roma-led, international public interest law organization that focuses on engaging in a range of activities to help combat anti-Romani racism and human rights abuses of the Romani people. This organization also brings public attention and political awareness to the human rights situation of the Roma. The ERRC helps the Roma with legal protection and direct aid in education, health, housing, and public services in Europe.
One of the most notorious recent attacks on Roma occurred in Ukraine. Beginning this April of 2018, the Ukrainian far-right nationalist group, C14, attacked a number of Roma camps under the excuse of “cleaning Ukraine’s cities”. However, no one was arrested, and the government even gave a state grant to support the movement as “patriotic education”. The ERRC steped in and empowered the Roma victims to sue the government of Ukraine.
The European Health Alliance works to improve the poor state of health care among the Roma. It was also co-founded with the Health Program of the EU. This organization promotes strategies for early childhood development and mainstream Roma integration. The EHPA has recommended a number of actions to the European Commission to prioritize the elimination on health inequalities among the Roma. For example, Roma children and infants have lower life expectancies compared with non-Roma citizens. The EPHA states that the poor state of health in Roma communities is prevalent and their statistical numbers from various social fields are often being ignored throughout Europe.